Next Page

Previous Page

New Media Communications Home Page

Beginning of Comm Project

Index for Communication Project

I felt that in the actual text of my paper (which was really long, I know; sorry to put everybody through that, but the description of this "context" has been tough (like I said before, there's not much of a "sociology" of technology in any fields as of yet, much less in the church scene, where all of this is just picking up steam and generating reactions, expectations of all kinds, and in most cases, confusion. That is the context I see, and I am looking to bring a lot of shape and clarity to this online magazine project <<<<<<<<Project<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Stay tuned for the SYNERGY The PROJECT, the Newsletter/online magazine "New Technology Review"

I hope no one feels I am angry about this. I rather like the clarification process. I want us all to agree----- that's a part of this process. More importantly, I want us to understand each other, and I may not have done a good job of that.

I look forward to the synergy process.

Speaking of synergy, are we still holding to the March 15 deadline for this? If so, it seems we are running a bit late on getting into the synergy. I think we need talk about this. And what of this "approval" stage where we "give the go ahead" to each of ourselves to move on to the next stage, per discussed at Dayton the last day of intensive?


Where is everyone? Not a note for a week! Busy time? I'm beat tonight after a tough week, but I've been looking every day, and nothing going on. After I went on and on and on with my context. Did I put everybody to sleep? I'm not talking about this meeting, but all the others. Maybe all are moving on to Synergy? I don't see anything there either.