TheoBlogical Community
The Blog that took over New Media Communications  A place to reflect and connect on the subject of Theological Community and Online Community

Stories  

 

My Resume

NMC Home Page


Buy some of my Books!















Subscribe to "TheoBlogical Community" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.



 

 

  Tuesday, September 10, 2002

"My way or the highway" approach to Biblical interpretations (something I have seen all too often in my earlier days as a Southern Baptist) is something AKMA addresses in his "hermeneutics" offerings
comment []
11:37:29 PM    


Southern Baptist Theolgical President Shows HIs Stuff

In Mohler  blames old SBC  for Clinton's behaviour , I get a little miffed and disgusted
comment []
10:36:31 PM    

A Year Ago Tonight and Tomorrow Morning

read my account Sept. 10-11, 2002


comment []
8:33:52 PM    

AKMA's Hermeneutic Discussion

(David Weinberger, in our discussion yesterday, said I should check out his post regarding AKMA, so on I go)

In his discussion of hermeneutics,  and comparison of integral vs differential (supposing there is one right interpretation of intent of the author vs allowing or Not-insisting that there is ONE RIGHT interpretation of intent ----he makes a point that I consider important to the larger question of "unity in diversity"

"In a certain respect, these two aren't antithetical. The unity of meaning (on a differential account) lies entirely beyond the present order- but don't deny some sort of unity. Similarly, integralists don't deny plurality nor do they (usually--but sc. Southern Baptist seminaries) wish by main force to impose their interpretive conclusions. "

The last point,  complete with reference to the Southern Baptists,  is one I feel compelled to agree ,  and to comment (as a somewhat embarassed Southern Baptist who does NOT support the rhetoric of insistence upon "correct interpretation" as is sought by the imposers) .  I  can completely confirm as accurate the implication that they intend to "enforce" some sets of requirements for "legitimate standing in the theological community".  I find this present set of Southern Baptist Leaders who are engaged in the campaigns of "disenfranchising" thousands of decent,  honest,  but of a "different mind" as to the interpretations of Scriptures,  to be out of bounds in terms of the ethics of Chrsitian community,  not becuase of their views,  but because they seek to question the legitimacy of the Christian journey of those who do not agree. 

In The Southern Baptist Convention, I express some more of the levels of disgust I have with this whole ordeal that has rolled through the Southern Baptist Copnvention for the past 20 years (I graduated from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in 1981,  just before the fundamentalist, "liberal witch-hunt" commenced,  which totally changed the face and level of education in that seminary,  and sent most of its teachers elsewhere)


comment []
6:45:43 PM    



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 Dale Lature.
Last update: 9/23/2003; 1:51:24 PM.

September 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Aug   Oct


See my Movable Type Version (still learning)


Search this weblog
Search WWW
Subscrition List Restored (see below)

Some Favorites
More Favorites
Radioactive



My Subscriptions




Search this weblog
Search WWW