|
|
|
Thursday, May 08, 2003 |
|
Howard posted comments to the post I reference previously (plasticbag, below) , and I figured there was also a post at Smart Mobs, and of course, there was. Rheingold wrote what is a "classic" for many interested in things like "Social Software", and got many people interested in it and working on it in the first place (The Virtual Community). (I speak for myself first and foremost)
6:09:35 PM
|
|
I had seen this and followed some of the links, without being aware that this "field", although not in and of itself new, was being described with this new, in the process of being defined, teminology. (With Comments by a couple other people in my Blogroll, Howard Rheingold (Smart Mobs Blog) and Jon Lebowski (Weblogsky)
6:00:31 PM
|
|
This sequence was somewhat flattering to me (or at least I think it may be flattering):
Where has God gone?
Interesting article from The Philospher's Magazine Online:
Perhaps the reason why "God" is rarely an explicit topic of philosophical debate at present is not that God is obsolete, but that the idea is under reconstruction, and its new form is not yet wholly clear. And that, for a philosopher, is heaven - with or without God.
via Time's Shadow
...Actually he/she may have gone here ...
TheoBlogical applying Cluetrain principles to organised religion
4:33:10 PM
|
|
On the previous blog I reported as "newly discovered from my referrer logs", I found a reference to Technorati. I've been there numerous times, I think usually because I see things from there in my refererrer logs. Well, I just plugged in my URL there and found a few more people who link to me, like this GoodDogBadDog one referenced here.
4:11:56 PM
|
|
Here's a weblog I just ran across in my Referrer list, and so , as I usually do when I see a new or different listing there, I navigate to it to see what they've said and why they've linked to me. They're talking about a new News Aggregator to use after making a move to Movable Type from Radio. So I will read on.
3:53:18 PM
|
|
|
Dave Weinberger and AKMA at Vanderbilt Yesterday. It was a really fun
thing to hear the dialogue, and hear from David and AKMA. After "canoeing" my
way downtown amidst all the totrrential downpour, I listened and , in the
afternoon session, contributed a bit to the groups discussion. |
In the morning session, there was some interesting
discussion (and also a bit annoying) about the role of the "expert" and
someone taking offense to Weinberger's comment about the Web encouraging
disdain for "experts". AKMA and David weren't going to say it, but
I will: it FIGURES that at a place like Vanderbilt, you'd have
some rather "elitist" mentalities defending the role of "expertise", and
another person expressed oppostion to "The Web is good" idea. Dave's
response was "Is the world good?" Which is what I usually ask people
who emphasize the negative aspects of the Web. Yes, there will
be manipulation and in-authenticity, and evil and perversion....and
so it is in the world.
Both presenters , in presenting an overview of their views of the role
of the Internet in education , presented it as a "widening" of
the sphere of influence, and a widening of the "accessibility" to
the public for "contribution" to the body of knowledge.
In the afternoon, the focus was Weblogs in education, which
interested me further still. AKMA talked about his class (or classes)
at Seabury-western where he requires student weblogs. The thing
AKMA celebrated about that was how students are talking to each other
more about their work, and about what they think of each other's
ideas. WIKIs were described and explored (as "Social Software", which
David pointed out as being a relatively new "discipline"). WIKIs
allow for a kind of free-for-all editing of pages, and an easy
interface for creating new links that create new pages and extend the "Web" for
that topic. We also discussed messaging and chatting and commenting
during a speaker or professor presentation.
I asked if AKMA and Dave could illuminate "TrackBack" that is a feature
on Movable Type and other Weblogs, where comments about a particular
posts can receive "pings" from other weblog software (which have the
feature) that a post has been made that points to that entry, thus
extending the notion of Comments (usually a place on the blog in question
where a reader who has come to this blog can post a comment about that
entry. Trackback does not require the commenter to navigate to
the entry and "Leave" a comment....but "Notifies" the post (usually in a
link provided below the post, and usually right next to the link
to the local "Comments", indicating that on another page that opens
up, there will be one or more links to blogs that "blog" this particular
blog. A "distributed" discussion is thus possible.
Someday, hopefully soon, the Church can wake up to this "revolution" (as
I see it) in the idea of what a discussion is; what dialogue is; what
EDUCATION is. |
11:21:44 AM
|
|
| |